Ranking Criteria

The ranking of registered candidates for Doctoral programs is conducted based on a comprehensive evaluation of several key criteria. These criteria provide a holistic assessment of each candidate's qualifications and potential for success in the doctoral program. The evaluation process typically includes:

1. Work Experience: The candidate's work experience in the same or related field as the doctoral program is a significant factor. Relevant work experience demonstrates practical application of knowledge and skills, as well as a commitment to the field.

2. Scientific Publications and Conference Participation: The candidate's research contributions, including scientific publications and participation in international conferences, are closely examined. These demonstrate the candidate's ability to conduct independent research, disseminate findings, and engage with the academic community on a global scale.

3. Master's Thesis: The quality and relevance of the candidate's Master's thesis from their second-cycle studies are evaluated. A strong Master's thesis indicates the candidate's research capabilities, analytical skills, and understanding of advanced concepts within their field of study.

4. Total Average GPA: The candidate's overall academic performance, including the GPA from both first-cycle and second-cycle studies, is taken into account. This provides an indication of the candidate's academic aptitude, consistency, and diligence throughout their educational journey.

These criteria are typically weighted and assessed according to the specific requirements and preferences of the doctoral program or institution. The evaluation process aims to identify candidates who demonstrate not only academic excellence but also research potential, professional experience, and a strong commitment to advancing knowledge in their chosen field.